一，突发神精，来把它们三儿来比较
在网上看到好多文章说nginx有多么，多么好。不管好不好，看看测试结果在说，
1，nginx＋php-cgi说明
nginx我开启了11个进程，php-cgi我开启了10个进程
2，apache＋php-cgi说明
httpd我开启了11个进程，php-cgi我开启了10个进程
3，apache＋php-cli说明
没作任何限制
二，测试文件一test.php无逻辑文件
<?phpphpinfo();
?>
1，nginx+php-cgi
[[email protected] zhangy]# /usr/local/bin/webbench -c 100 -t 30 http://localhost/test.php
Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark 1.5
Copyright (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.
Benchmarking: GET http://localhost/test.php
100 clients, running 30 sec.
Speed=61598 pages/min, 1524550 bytes/sec.
Requests: 30799 susceed, 0 failed.
2，apache+php-cgi
[[email protected] zhangy]# /usr/local/bin/webbench -c 100 -t 30 http://localhost/test.php
Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark 1.5
Copyright (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.
Benchmarking: GET http://localhost/test.php
100 clients, running 30 sec.
Speed=15000 pages/min, 371750 bytes/sec.
Requests: 7500 susceed, 0 failed.
3，apache+php-cli
[[email protected] conf]# /usr/local/bin/webbench -c 100 -t 30 http://localhost/test.php
Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark 1.5
Copyright (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.
Benchmarking: GET http://localhost/test.php
100 clients, running 30 sec.
Speed=54618 pages/min, 1357257 bytes/sec.
Requests: 27309 susceed, 0 failed.
三，测试文件二test1.php
<?php$con = mysql_connect("localhost","username","password");
if (!$con)
{
die('Could not connect: ' . mysql_error());
}
mysql_select_db("test", $con);
mysql_query('set names utf8');
$result = mysql_query("SELECT id, name, sex FROM test ");
while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result))
{
echo $row['id'] . "+" . $row['name']."+".$row['sex'];
echo "
";
}
mysql_close($con);
?>
1，nginx+php-cgi
[[email protected] zhangy]# /usr/local/bin/webbench -c 100 -t 30 http://localhost/test1.php
Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark 1.5
Copyright (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.
Benchmarking: GET http://localhost/test1.php
100 clients, running 30 sec.
Speed=60716 pages/min, 324830 bytes/sec.
Requests: 30358 susceed, 0 failed.
2，apache+php-cgi
[[email protected] zhangy]# /usr/local/bin/webbench -c 100 -t 30 http://localhost/test1.php
Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark 1.5
Copyright (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.
Benchmarking: GET http://localhost/test1.php
100 clients, running 30 sec.
Speed=12800 pages/min, 68906 bytes/sec.
Requests: 6400 susceed, 0 failed.
3，apache+php-cli
[[email protected] zhangy]# /usr/local/bin/webbench -c 100 -t 30 http://localhost/test1.php
Webbench - Simple Web Benchmark 1.5
Copyright (c) Radim Kolar 1997-2004, GPL Open Source Software.
Benchmarking: GET http://localhost/test1.php
100 clients, running 30 sec.
Speed=78844 pages/min, 575834 bytes/sec.
Requests: 39422 susceed, 0 failed.
四，个人分析
1，针对无逻辑文件，或者静态文件
在内存，cpu都没有最大化利用的情况下nginx＋php-cgi效果比apache+php-cli的效果好一点，而apache+php-cli是最大化用内存和cpu，由起可见，nginx＋php-cgi的对无罗辑或静态文件的解析要好很多。apache+php-cgi的效果很差，虽然php官方力挺php-cgi，但是根apache的配合效果不好。
2，针对逻辑复杂的文件
针对逻辑复杂的文件时，nginx＋php-cgi对php的解析的效果下降了，但是下降的不是很厉害。而apache＋php-cli对php的解析的效果去增强了，增加了很多，是原来的差不多1.5倍。nginx＋php-cgi在利用部分内存和CPU的情况下根apache＋php-cli对php的解析都差不了多少，个人认为。nginx＋php-cgi要比apache＋php-cli要好。但是要想达到好多好多倍，我看难。
上面所做对比，不考虑11nginx，配合10php-cgi是否合理，这个就nginx来说，肯定不是很合理的。